Here are the nominated entries (had to exclude a couple because they didn't seem to be from November 2006)
1. Beeker - on beauty and being irrational
2. Mr PH Colman - scary? moi?
3. Kathy Sierra - the zone of expendability?
4. Richard Huntington - what do advertising agencies do daddy?
5. Leland Maschmeyer - the perfectly designed office
6. The Amateur Gourmet - chutzpah, truffles and alain ducasse
7. Ben Terrett - inside 50 years of graphic work (and play)
8. Mr PH Colman - low fidelity
9. Mr PH Colman - youtubers
10. Mohammed Iqbal - aphorisms on blogging
PaulC's name appears three times on this ballot.
That's not even allowed in Congo. Or Florida.
I fear total world domination of red socks before spring.
Posted by: Camiel | December 14, 2006 at 10:04 AM
I just watched todays Zefrank, he talks about the relationship the viewer has with him, breaking 4th wall, possible 5th wall?, divorcing the audience and stuff......Well, the comments in these posts become part of the overall experience they integrate and alter the original actual thing created. I guess like barnacles on a whale...In judging posts are we un/consciously judging the comments as well? Just a thought!
Posted by: Richard | December 14, 2006 at 10:21 AM
Who is responsible for nominating 'Youtubers' for post of the month?
Or is it nominated, as Richard suggests, for the debate it generated?
Posted by: Lebowski | December 14, 2006 at 12:28 PM
I think I got the youtubers nomination from someone in an email. They were having technical commenting difficulties.
Posted by: russell | December 14, 2006 at 12:33 PM
Who is responsible for nominating the post from 'An Idea a Day'? Oh yeah - no one.
Posted by: Colman | December 14, 2006 at 12:51 PM
Paul, don't tempt fate like that.
Posted by: Ben | December 14, 2006 at 01:11 PM
Who voted for scary moi?
Posted by: Marcus Brown | December 14, 2006 at 03:23 PM
I am a little upset that the answer dancer hasn't made it into the nominations. Is it too late to enter it now?
Or are you saving it for post of the year?
Posted by: williamdeed | December 14, 2006 at 08:28 PM
Does low fidelity post belong to December post?
Posted by: Oakie | December 15, 2006 at 04:25 AM
oh bugger yes. low fidelity is December. Damn. My complex compliance systems seems to have gone awry. Let's just pretend it was November. sorry.
Posted by: russell | December 15, 2006 at 08:22 AM
Ugh. Voting on these posts is impossible. It is like the Oscars or so many other awards, where really picking "the best" is laughable. Especially because this is a "planning blog" and they therefore can be about ANYTHING. I am sure this has been expressed before, but how does one compare posts on planning as a function, blogging as a culture, and truffle-eating as a farce? And then pick the BEST. Great posts, all of them. Thanks for doing this Russell.
Posted by: Cameron | December 15, 2006 at 11:10 PM