« December 2012 | Main | February 2013 »
January 31, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Kindle Book 53 was Little Bets by Peter Sims.
And we're up to date! That's everything I've read on my Kindle so far.
Affordable loss, that makes sense:
"Sarasvathy points to the value of what she calls the affordable loss principle. Seasoned entrepreneurs, she emphasizes, will tend to determine in advance what they are willing to lose, rather than calculating expected gains."
People are more honest when it's rough:
"Prototyping allows P&G staff to make things in order to think. “How do you let consumers experience it, even if it falls totally apart within five minutes?” Thoen asks: The level of feedback you get is so much more valuable and impactful…. The problem with showing something to consumers when it’s almost totally done, people don’t necessarily want to give negative feedback at that point because it looks like, “This company has spent a lot of money already getting it to this stage and now I’m going to tell them, ‘It sucks.’” On the other hand, if something hangs together with tape, and it’s clear that it’s an early prototype, the mindset of consumers often is, “These people still need some help, so let me tell you what I really think about it.” Thoen beautifully describes the value of prototyping: Potential users of ideas are more comfortable sharing their honest reactions when it’s rough, just as people at P&G are less emotionally invested in their ideas."
Accept the starting point:
"Throughout the Pixar creative process, they rely heavily on what they call plussing; it is likely the most-used concept around the company. The point of plussing is to build upon and improve ideas without using judgmental language. Creating an atmosphere where ideas are constantly being plussed, while maintaining a sense of humor and playfulness, is a central element of Pixar’s magic. The practice of plussing draws upon those core principles from improvisation: accepting every offer and making your partner look good. Rather than criticize an idea in its entirety (even if they don’t think it’s good), people accept the starting point before suggesting improvements"
Thank God for moderate importance.
"what organizational psychologist Karl Weick refers to as small wins. Weick defines a small win as “a concrete, complete, implemented outcome of moderate importance"
January 30, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Kindle Book 52 was Small Message, Big Impact: Put The Elevator Speech Effect to Work For You by Terri Sjodin which I didn't find very useful.
I read it because I've been fascinated by the idea of the elevator pitch ever since I ran across it at Microsoft in the late 90s.
The story they told was of being in an elevator with Bill Gates whose default question was always - what are you working on? That meant that every Microsoft manager had a tremendous and snappy answer to that question. Snappiness was necessary because Microsoft elevators only went about three floors. Tremendousness was necessary for obvious reasons. I assumed they invented the idea, because I'd never heard it before, but looking back that doesn't seem very likely. Partly because most Microsoft buildings didn't have elevators at all.
Searching back through books on Google it looks like it was originally a Hollywood thing. Which makes sense. And looking on NGram, it looks like it started in the 80s somewhere, which also makes sense.
January 29, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Book 52. Managers as Designers in the Public Services: Beyond Technomagic by David Wastell.
Another good and dense read for work. Lots of meaty sense. Gets to the point that digital service design, or whatever it is we're doing, isn't just out there, it's in here, it's us. We need to redesign the system of work.
"managers need to see their main business as the designers of the workplace, of the system of work, a role in which technology has a vital part to play, as the instrument of innovation."
"this means the design of systems made up of people, processes and technology in order to achieve the functions desired by the organisation in the service of its customers and clients. Put in more prosaic terms, it means finding the best way of organising the workplace."
I can see myself quoting this: "Hard work is required and authentic engagement; technology is too important to leave to others."
"Doing design well depends on our attitude to technology. A magical attitude will not do. Hard work is required and authentic engagement; technology is too important to leave to others. Brown & Hagel (2003) contend that the productivity paradox, the dissociation between investments in technology and actual benefits, reflects the failure of many organisations to use technology to innovate their business practices: “Companies that mechanically insert IT into their businesses… will only destroy IT’s economic value. Unfortunately, all too many companies do this” (p.2). Tellingly, those organisations which stand out in terms of the business value generated by IT are those which emphasise its innovative potential and have retained their in-house design capability, rather than relying on packed software or outsourcing."
"‘You can’t manage what you can’t model; understanding is all’"
"The Sciences of the Artificial, first published in 1966. Simon famously defines design as “courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones"
"A design attitude views each project as an opportunity to question basic assumptions, a resolve to leave the world a better place. Designers relish the lack of predetermined outcomes, the opportunity to go back to those assumptions that have become invisible and unnoticed, looking for the real thing we are trying to accomplish, unvarnished by years of organizational habit. A design attitude fosters a problem-solving process that remains liquid and open, celebrating path-creating ideas about new ways to use technology and new work processes"
"Twenty First Century Government is enabled by technology – policy is inspired by it, business change is delivered by it… Moreover modern governments with serious transformational intent see technology as a strategic asset and not just a tactical tool. So this strategy’s vision is about better using technology to deliver public services and policy outcomes that have an impact on citizens’ daily lives: through greater choice and personalisation, delivering better public services, such as health, education and pensions; benefiting communities by reducing burdens on front line staff…"
"Many years ago, the philosopher Karl Popper warned of the dangers of top-down design or “utopian engineering” as he called it, distinguished by “a dangerous dogmatic attachment to a blue-print”. It is the blue-print approach which is in the dock here, design as a noun, the conceit that there are pre-existing solutions which can be simply picked off the shelf and implemented. Popper’s antidote to dogma-driven design was the piecemeal approach, the execution of small scale experiments with continuous adjustments in which “we can make mistakes and learn from our mistakes”, i.e. designing as an open, form-giving process."
"alignment of three elements is vital for the creation of public value (the so-called “strategic triangle”): first, public value must be defined (i.e. strategic goals and outcomes); secondly, the “authorising environment” must be put in place to legitimise and sustain the necessary strategic action (i.e. the required coalition must be built of stakeholders from all sectors, including the community); and thirdly, operational capacity must be created, harnessing resources from outside as well as inside the organisation (again including the community)"
And this: resourcefulness is more crucial than resources.
"“resourcefulness is more crucial than resources – [using] whatever resources and repertoire one has to perform whatever task one faces” (p.346). Weick argues that bricolage is the quintessence of leadership: “the main function of any leader is to draw organisation out of the raw materials of life… fixing things on the spot through a creative vision of what is available and what might be done”"
Simple v complex - different arrangements
"They dub this the strategy of “complex organisations and simple jobs”. The second response takes the opposite tack, reducing control and coordination by the creation of self-contained units. Fragmented tasks are to be combined into larger wholes, thinking to be re-united with doing; in other words, a strategy of “simple organisations and complex jobs”."
"“if you truly want to understand something, try to change it!”"
"simply using technology to automate the status quo will not do."
"There is little sense that e-government is really seen as anything new or radical; it has seemingly been translated into… internet access to services. The service providers have a lot to gain from this defence, as they can escape the rigorous scrutiny that fundamental re-engineering might entail (Wastell, 2002)."
"A practicum is a setting designed for the task of learning a practice. In a context that approximates a practice world, students learn by doing… They learn by undertaking projects that simulate or simplify practice; or they take on real-world projects under close supervision. The practicum is a virtual world, relatively free of the pressures, distractions and risks of the real one (ibid., p.37)."
"I have observed that students must begin designing before they know what it means to do so. They quickly discover that their instructors cannot tell them what designing is, or that they cannot learn what their instructors mean until they have plunged into designing. Hence, in the early stages of the design studio, confusion and mystery reign. Yet in a few years or even months, some students begin to produce what they and their instructors regard as progress toward competent design. Coach and student finish each other’s sentences and speak elliptically in ways that mystify the uninitiated. (Schön, 1988, p.42)."
January 28, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
...the headline at the top of this blog was "we're as disappointed as you are". There's a reason why in these comments.
For some reason I was reminded of that by this excellent Tim Harford article.
The picture is unconnected.
January 27, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
We went to the Model Engineering Show at Alexandra Palace at the weekend. I found myself drawn to the little figures that sometimes populate the models. They're often the least regarded bit of the model, pre-bought, not scratch built, not always exactly to scale, often not at the same fidelity as the engineering they're there to decorate. A bit like 3D render ghosts.
We were talking at the show, about the way modeling acts as a way of preserving an engineering culture - capturing in minature particular conjunctions of techniques and materials. And about how there'd probably be no equivalent for the age of network technologies. The internet won't get modeled in miniature.
Then, yesterday there was a programme on BBC4 about model railways. Apart from some gratingly emphatic gender politics (model railways are for DADS and SONS) there was a little more analysis than the usual nostalgia-fest and someone pointed out that model railways only captured the physical stuff, didn't model the social relationships. And I thought Hornby Network Modelling!
I don't know what that means. Obviously. But I'd like to work it out. Like Lyddle End 2050, but for networks. Or Network Realism, but with glue. Or something.
Anyway.
January 25, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Book 51. Don't Think of an Elephant by George Lakoff. Probably no startling revelations in here for any of you lot.
I liked the idea of a ten-word philosophy though, such as this summary of Republicanism:
"Strong Defense, Free Markets, Lower Taxes, Smaller Government, Family Values."
January 24, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
January 23, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)
Kindle Book 48. A Moveable Feast by Ernest Hemmingway. One highlight, my favourite sentence ever:
"The blue-backed notebooks, the two pencils and the pencil sharpener (a pocket knife was too wasteful), the marble-topped tables, the smell of café crèmes, the smell of early morning sweeping out and mopping and luck were all you needed."
January 22, 2013 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)